To all who really read my blog, not rushing through it to post some comment hoping to look smart, you know that my position on the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) is clear. However, I will reiterate it:
- There is a GWOT and we should fight it.
- There are those in the world who wish us harm and we should kill them in the GWOT as fast as humanly possible.
- IRAQ is NOTHING MORE THAN A DISTRACTION FROM THIS. There is clearly no evidence that Iraq, prior to the invasion, harbored terrorists in any significant way, had WMDs, nor had any link to Al Qaeda (until we brought them together by invading the Country).
- Bush and Rumsfeld have put the GWOT in danger of failure and put our Country's security at risk by not staying focused on GWOT but rather going for a big "show" for the world and national TV. It was designed to show they were doing something, anything, and it has back fired. By stretching our troops and budgets so thin, they actually have put us more at risk and not less at at risk.
- They should be impeached/fired for the danger they have put this Country in.
Almost to prove my point, we had the London bombings a few weeks ago. In our quick attempt to show that the entire Muslim world (i.e., Countries) was part of it we immediately proclaimed Al Qaeda to blame and very quickly started saying this shows why we are involved in the GWOT (Again, equating Iraq to GWOT is wrong). We then found something very interesting. The suspects were British born and raised and were British citizens. Hmmmm, I wonder what part Saddam played in this? Given our behavior, are we to bomb Britain and invade them for "harboring terrorists"?
No, of course not. What we are finding here, as I have said all along, is that the GWOT is far more complicated than Bush/Blair led us to believe or want to believe themselves. The GWOT is about non governmental organizations (NGOs and mostly religious), it is about the wahabi sect of Islam (Mostly harbored and encouraged by Saudi Arabia, our ally), and anyone can be part of it. Once again proving that the invasion of Iraq was ludicrous in the war on terror.
Some were saying, before 7/07 that the fact we have had no terrorist acts in the Western world (excluding Spain I guess) since the invasion of Iraq proved we had taken the "fight to them", we were fighting them on "their soil" and we are somehow safer. 7/07 proved that argument to go into the heap of untruths including WMDs, Saddam's involvement with Al Qaeda and Rumsfeld's declaration that the state of the armed forces is "just fine".
Invading countries, seemingly at random, may look like you are doing something but really you are not. The invasion of Iraq has done nothing to make us safer and by stretching our military very thin, it is making us more vulnerable.
Unfortunately, Londoners learned a very expensive lesson. Let's hope we do not.
Recent Comments