The fact that Microsoft has decided to take $42Bln (Roughly) and spend it on Yahoo is a BAD decision for shareholders. There are two main reasons I say this. First, almost always, this type of merger is decretive to corporate value not accretive. Over 80% end up in failure and rather than 1+1=3, 1+1 actually equals 1.5 at best. My prediction is that out of this merger at least $20bl will evaporate into thin air.
Second, and to me the the most troubling, is why does Microsoft think they can spend MY (the investor's) money buy buying Yahoo? This is the big problem with companies hoarding cash (by the way, the cash is MINE not MSFT management's). If I want to buy Yahoo, they can return all the excess cash to the shareholders and let the shareholders decide if they want to invest their money in Yahoo or not. In essence, what is happening here, is that you took some of your money, invested in a company called Microsoft. Their management took that money and said, "Thank you, we are going to use it to buy Yahoo". That is not a good thing. You were forced to buy a company you did not want to buy (presumably or you would not have bought MSFT to begin with).
The arrogance of corporate management and the lack of action by neutered boards is astounding. Meanwhile, it is the investor who suffers. My guess is that while the deal will cause value to evaporate, senior managers will make out pretty good.
And that, alas, is the problem.
Recent Comments